Menu

Vaginal Mesh Implants: Is Any Brand Safe?

by Andrew Mounier on December 18, 2012

These days, we are faced with more and more options when it comes to our healthcare. While many of the new products on the market are highly beneficial—and in some cases, can even be lifesaving—others are not as effective. This is especially true when it comes to vaginal mesh implants, which may vary quite dramatically in quality and effectiveness. Individuals who are considering the inclusion of these products should have a basic understanding of their use, and be able to identify the risks associated with vaginal mesh implants produced by different medical companies.

Without a doubt, having a basic understanding of the background of vaginal mesh implants is essential for individuals who are considering the use of the products. According to Drug Watch, vaginal mesh implants and medical devices that were designed in the late 1990s as a treatment for moderate to severe forms of pelvic organ prolapsed and stress urinary incontinence. Unlike many over-the-counter remedies, vaginal mesh implants required major surgery for placement, thus increasing the risks of the products to even greater levels. While there are a number of organizations around the world that produces these items, the most well-known include Johnson and Johnson, Bard Medical, and Boston Scientific.

As mentioned above, vaginal mesh implants that were manufactured by Johnson and Johnson were some of the most popular on the market. Pre-cut vaginal mesh and the provision of required tools made them a common choice by surgeons living in all parts of the world. Despite begin used for nearly 15 years, the FDA issued a recall against vaginal mesh implants that were manufactured by Johnson and Johnson due to failure and injury associated with the items. Since this time, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against the company for providing dangerous products to consumers.

Other brands that have faced significant legal problems over the past few years due to the distribution of their vaginal mesh implants include Bard Medical and Boston Scientific. While injuries are varied, patients who received products made by Bard Medical are believed to be at risk for nerve damage, infection, and certain types of skin erosion. Unsurprisingly, the company is facing hundreds of lawsuits from individual patients who received the items. Similarly, Boston Scientific is fighting many private cases that claim the vaginal mesh implants manufactured by the company are behind the development of high rates of organ puncture.

Obviously, the risks associated with vaginal mesh implants are varied and serious. While they likely can provide many important benefits when produced in a responsible manner, most of the products currently on the market are considered to be quite dangerous for private use. Individuals who have been diagnosed with one of the conditions described able may want to consider consultation with a series of physicians before making a final decision on the use of these implants. In some cases, minor, less invasion procedures may be able to produce results that are similar to those obtained through the use of vaginal mesh implants.

If you have suffered injuries and were forced to seek medical attention as a direct result of your vaginal mesh implants, you may have a case and should contact a lawyer.  Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley, P.C. is a transvaginal mesh law firm located in Athens, Georgia.  For more information about the risks of transvaginal mesh, visit the website at www.SurgicalMeshHelp.com.

 

Andrew Mounier
Andrew Miller (Mounier) is an experienced Content Engineer and Author. He has worked in marketing for over a decade and finds his passion in bringing concepts to life for the world to enjoy. He is also an avid legal blogger and currently working on a book with his wife about social entrepreneurship. He is a true Socialpreneur and finds that his goal in life is to be an agent for positive social change through both his writing and business endeavors.
Andrew Mounier
Andrew Mounier

Latest posts by Andrew Mounier (see all)

Previous post:

Next post: